E. O. Wilson’s much anticipated new book, “The Social Conquest of Earth”, focuses on the human dimension of his highly controversial 2010 paper “The Evolution of Eusociality” which begins with the sentence:

Eusociality, in which some individuals reduce their own lifetime reproductive potential to raise the offspring of others,
underlies the most advanced forms of social organization and the ecologically dominant role of social insects and humans.

Since E. O. Wilson has recently stated that preserving Earth’s biodiversity against human encroachment is his “religion”, the juxtaposition of the first sentence of his paper on human eusociality’s “ecological dominance”, with his claimed “religion” of protecting biodiversity from that same “ecological dominance”, indicates that his new book on human eusociality would be an epic clash of thesis and antithesis.  One would have every reason to expect an equally epic synthesis and consilience as a fitting magnum opus to E. O. Wilson’s illustrious career.

I had particular reason to be interested in his book, since I am convinced that eusociality is not an essential, nor even desirable aspect of the human condition, and share Wilson’s strong “biophilia”.  This commitment is the product of a lifelong character development, as the study of eusociality and biodiversity has been to E. O. Wilson.  This development is worth recounting, as it bears directly on the exceptionally relevant context I bring to my reading of “The Social Conquest of Earth”:

Growing out of my youthful membership in Zero Population Growth in 1969, I wrote the world’s first massively multiplayer virtual world game—which is significant here only because it was also the first attempt to simulate application of nonterrestrial resources to terrestrial limits to growth.  A little over a decade later, as a member of the San Diego Sierra Club, I hosted annual conferences in the Laguna Mountains lodge on the topic, “What Good Are Humans?” and, as a result, was quoted by OMNI magazine as an advocate of space development because of my unusual commitment to protecting terrestrial biodiversity.  During this period a book titled “Bringing Life to the Stars” by cognitive psychologist David Duemler was dedicated to me despite the fact that, as described in that book, I differed with his promotion of utilitarianism over biodiversity.  Following on that, I embarked on a series of public policy initiatives with the aim of expanding the resources available to civilization.  This included leading a grassroots coalition to pass legislation at the Federal level requiring NASA to procure launch services from the private sector.  This, in turn led to the sincerest flattery by a rival space activist who is about to announce the first asteroid mining company backed by prominent adventure capitalists.

One might expect, given my background, that my primary interest would be in Wilson’s expansion of his often-stated objection to space development as a supposed panacea for protection of biodiversity from the encroachment by human eusociality.

That is not the case.

My primary interest was in how, given his “religious” commitment to protect biodiversity, Wilson could reconcile limiting humanity to the biosphere with his own prominent statement about human eusociality’s ecological dominance of other species.  There is absolutely no evidence that the presence of human eusociality in the biosphere is compatible with biodiversity.  Indeed, all indications point the opposite direction as we are in the midst of one of the largest extinction events in the geologic record and it is directly caused by human eusociality.  With this in mind, my own struggle has been with the practicalities of excluding technological civilization from the biosphere—most probably as part of the transition to a heliocentric resource base.  These practicalities are formidable since any residual human presence on Earth would present a clear and present danger that, simply by force of habit, a resurgent biospheric civilization would again threaten biodiversity. 

How would E. O. Wilson, this towering genius of eusociality and leading light for biodivesity preservation address the practicalities of excluding technological civilization from the biosphere—given his opinion that a transition to a heliocentric resource base is not possible?

I received “The Social Conquest of Earth” in the mail and turned immediately to the table of contents.

Nothing.

I turned to the index.

No entry for “biodiversity”, “extinction” nor anything of the sort.

I paged through the chapters scanning for anything that might indicate a great mind was taking on the profound practical difficulties of reconciling human eusociality with biodiversity preservation.

Here, from chapter “A New Enlightenment”—the last chapter of the book—is the totality of what E. O. Wilson has to say about his “religion” and its fundamental conflict with the subject of the book in conclusion:

Also evident upon even casual inspection is the rapid disappearance of tropical forests and grasslands and other habitats where most of the diversity of life exists.  If global changes caused by HIPPO (Habitat destruction, Invasive species, Pollution, Overpopulation, and Overharvesting, in that order of importance) are not abated, half the species of plants and animals could be extinct or at least among the “living dead”—about to become extinct—by the end of the century.  We are needlessly turning the gold we inherited from our forebears into straw, and for that we will be despised by our descendants.

The obliteration of biodiversity in the living world has received much less attention than climate changes, depletion of irreplaceable resources, and other transformations of the physical environment.  It would be wise to observe the following principle:  if we save the living world, we will also automatically save the physical world, because in order to achieve the first we must also achieve the second.  But if we save only the physical world, which appears our present inclination, we will ultimately lose them both.  Until recently there existed many kinds of birds we will never again see fly.  Gone are frogs we will never again hear calling on warm rainy nights.  Gone are fish flashing silver in our impoverished lakes and streams.

This content-free gesture of moralizing rhetoric is what E. O. Wilson provides us on what should have been the central topic of his magnum opus.

Clearly, E. O. Wilson has another “religion” than the one he touts.  This sort of abject neurological failure might be chalked up to age-related cognitive decline if it weren’t for the fact that it is clear that, in other areas of the book where he elaborately argues that eusociality is the epitome of virtue, he is far from brain-dead.  His religion is Civilization, not biodiversity, and the elaborate presentation of his case for human eusociality’s virtue paints a rosey picture of human mass organisms, the antedote for which may be the mirror image bias of the viscerally revolting (consider yourself warned) horror movie “The Human Centipede”.

Civilization über alles.

by Karl LaForce

My intrepid traveling companion and I touched down at Eleftherios Venizelos airport in Athens on the day before the Independence Day holiday, which is March 25th of every year. It was a bright warm day, typical of the entire week we were there, but change is in the air, like a cleansing storm on the horizon that will bring a new day.

We took a 35 Euro taxi ride to our hotel just a few blocks from the Acropolis. After a brief rest we were met by our contact with ΧΡΥΣΗ ΑΥΓΗ (known in English as Golden Dawn, hereafter GD for short).  George, which was his name, took us straight to the GD headquarters in Athens.

At this location GD occupies two floors of a mixed residential and commercial building. It is one of many around the country. Some of GD’s Women’s Front members, about six in all, were busily cleaning the offices in anticipation of the weekly Saturday meeting. I later learned that some of the women cleaning had college degrees and were employed in professional positions, and that they demanded that the GD Women’s Front be responsible for the work of cleaning the offices.

The 2nd floor has a type of coffee bar/hang-out lounge, so we got ourselves two iced Greek style frappes and sat down to speak in greater detail with George. He told us of the protests in January 2012 in Athens in which as many as 20,000 Athenians had marched in opposition to the government monetary and immigration policy. He told us that Greece currently consisted of 10 million Greeks and 3 million immigrants. He told us of poverty levels that had not been seen since WWII. Yet, as he spoke, I detected an underlining optimism.  He felt that the enemies of Greece and Hellenism had pushed too far, and that Greece was on the verge of an epic change.

“The public is ready to embrace nationalism by electing GD parliament candidates”, he told us.  GD will have 118 candidates on the ballot in May. “The immigrants, the crime, the Euro, the never-ending austerity measures, the inability of the current government to protect the treasures of Greek antiquities either from immigrant vandals [referring to the February 2012 looting of the museum treasures in ancient Olympia] or from German banks ... all have played a part”.

As the time for the regular Saturday meeting neared, the number of people swelled to over a hundred. The energy was palpable, even over-flowing. Because of very real safety threats the security was heavy; in 2010 the GD Athens offices were bombed and, in a separate incident, there was also an attack against the Chairman at his home.

We met an organization lawyer, the official spokesman, and several of the brothers who were running for parliament.  The chairman arrived about an hour before the meeting, preceded by bodyguards.  One of them announced his arrival with a command that everyone stand.  Nikolaos G. Michaloliakos entered the room to a volley of Roman salutes; it was a thrilling moment!  Though he had never met my traveling companion or me, he walked straight up to us and offered us a warm welcome.  He said that after he had attended some pressing business we would be invited into his office for an informal chat.  After a few minutes, as promised, his bodyguards came for us.  I offered to leave my large folding pocket knife with them, but they allowed me to carry it in.  They understood that I had not come to harm their chairman, and they understood that their chairman was well protected by several big guys stationed inside the office.

After the few minutes in the Chairman’s office the regular meeting was ready to start. The party official spokesman gave a quick talk, and introduced the other speakers.  One of the speakers was a historian, dressed in 1821 period military garb.  He gave a speech on one of the fiercest battles during the war for independence from the Ottoman Empire.

At the end of the meeting a GD party official announced that contrary to previous plans, GD would not participate in any Independence Day parades the following day, due to the expectation of excessive police misconduct toward members.  The government had brought about 5000 riot policemen from around the country to guard the politicians, and there were even sharp shooters positioned on top of government buildings, for fear of insurrection.  This was somewhat of a disappointment for my traveling companion and I, as we had chosen our travel dates to coincide with the now canceled parade, however we were confident that the GD leadership had good reason to cancel the parade.

After the meeting there was a gathering at a local bar owned by a GD member. We were impressed by the closeness and camaraderie.  We saw tables at the bar where young love was at bloom, and we saw tables where young lions were plotting their next victories.  We would have stayed longer, but the travel weariness and jet lag dictated otherwise.  For a first day in a country new to me, the number and quality of new experiences had been overwhelming!  The good fortune of meeting Nationalist brothers and sisters, combined with being in the presence of the most impressive of all the ancient monuments built by our race - the majestic Acropolis – and to be walking the streets that had been walked by so many great men, had all made for something of a life changing experience.  It was one that would be deepened and expanded in the following days.

If you are not clear about the meaning of the term “natural duel”, first read and re-read “The Tale of Lin Tse” (with codification at Seven Points of Agreement Between Individuals (revised).)  As a warning to the majority, (the majority of Majority Rights’ commentariate being only one sampling): when you scoff at the culture—the socially honored routes to women giving birth and men giving death—that created to you, you scoff at your very being. 

Despite my repeated statements explicitly denying that Natural Duel is appropriate in present, and the vast majority of historic, circumstances (group selection as “state of war”), detractors continually presume, in their statements, that I am advocating the introduction of Natural Duel into present circumstances.

Very well.  If I am going to do the time, I may as well commit the crime.

READ MORE...

We are hearing a lot about the “true meaning of Easter” today—with many sermons on its contamination by “pagan” traditions.

What none of them will tell you is the true origin of Easter as the celebration of women’s liberation.

There is not one, and I mean not ONE Christian denomination that follows the teachings of Paul regarding women’s role in the church.  All, and I mean ALL Christian denominations that proclaim themselves to follow Paul’s teachings are not being honest with themselves.

There is a very simple reason for this:

True Christianity is not JudeoChristianity and JudeoChristianity is an invention of Jews who found the true story of Jesus mortally threatening.

True Christianity is rooted in the commitment to individual sovereignty, eternally and mortally opposed to group sovereignty, as demonstrated by Jesus’s message to us that “Ye are gods, children of the most high.”  ANY interposition of church, state, gang or any other group, between the Individual and the Father is of the serpent—the most ancient symbol for the kind of beast that arises when individuals give up their sovereignty to a group.  Other symbols were dragons, vipers and, worms.

The true sovereign may challenge any other sovereign to mortal combat in a formal declaration.  If those sovereigns are groups, then we call it war and we have not peace in the land.  If those sovereigns are individuals, we call it duel and we have not war in the land—for during war all individual duels are suspended, as exemplified by George Washington’s orders to his officers during the Revolutionary War.  It is obvious why priests, politicians, international bankers, Hollywood moguls and other manipulators would find it necessary to, first, impose silly rules on “duels” so they become exercises in specialized skills disconnected from nature—and then outlaw them entirely because such unnatural “duels” were destructive.  Maintaining perpetual war is the preferred mode of operation however since it centralizes power in the group and necessitates inhibition of even natural duel in which two men enter the State of Nature to use only that which Nature provides them to finally permanently resolve a mortal conflict between them as the ultimate appeal in dispute processing.

But what of a woman’s sovereignty?  That is the sovereignty of a woman’s love—of giving birth to new life.

Sacral respect for the individual woman’s choice of her mate, as well as sacral respect for the individual man’s choice of how to sacrifice his life in mortal combat, is alien to all cultures but one:

Indo-Europeans.

Reflected in numerous traditions depicting the abduction and imprisonment of the dawn goddess by a “dragon”, and her liberation by a heroic god slaying the dragon who imprisons her—we see the true meaning of Easter.

The name of that dawn goddess is, unsurprisingly, the Proto-Indoeuropean cognate of the word “East”, and is also the cognate of the word for “morning star”.  The name “Easter” is also a cognate reflected in various names for the dawn goddess.

Jews, such as Saul of Tarsus and modern day Hollywood myth makers, have, at least since Babylonian times (when they appropriated and altered the story, not only of the “serpent” from the Babylonian legends, but the prior record of how Cyrus came to liberate the peoples previously enslaved by that empire) routinely construct lies with which to manipulate masses.  If you think Hollywood Jews are any different from those ancient Jewish priests of Babylon, you are under their spell—currently cast by the new state religion (literally a theocracy to replace Christianity) of Holocaustianity as reflected in the fact that hundreds of movies have been made about the horrors of the Holocaust and not one—and I mean not ONE movie has been made about the Holodomor, in which Jewish leaders of the growing Soviet Empire starved millions of Ukranians to eradicate family farms.  The Holodomor occurred one year before Hitler came to power in Germany.

“Ye race of vipers.”  “Ye are of your father the devil…”

The one true religion is that which celebrates the individual as direct descendant of the most high:  The individual who rightfully says “I am in the Father and the Father is in me.” 

The miracle is our very Creation—the rest is secondary whether it be third or fourth hand stories, edited by Emperors and Talmudic Rabbis, of healing the sick, raising the dead, walking on water, or rising, one’s self, from the dead.

Priests have always sought to interpose themselves between the Individual and the miracle of Creation.  It is that interposition that gives them the power over the masses which they manipulate.

Saul, the Jewish butcher of Tarsus, had to imprison the goddess present in all women, in his teachings about the “proper” role of women in the church.  This he had to do in order to counter-balance the imprisonment of the god in men implied by the removal of their individual sovereignty by which they could challenge any hypocrite—any liar—any “head of the snake” to mortal combat in the State of Nature, under the authority of his father, Nature’s God, and remove that hypocritical manipulator of masses from the stream of creation.

So when you attend an Easter service at Dawn, remember.

by David Hamilton

Further to the recent posts about my ordeal with The Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Unit I have been interviewed by two different officers from the CTU about imaginary links they tried to say I had with a terrorist. In the UK, the Counter Terrorism Command (CTC) are trying to build up a narrative of how the “far-right” are terrorists just like those in the Muslim community. I became ensnared in this effort because a man I never met liked a letter I wrote and posted on Facebook. This was decided on at a meeting between a senior Metropolitan Police officer and a meeting of Muslims.(1)

There is a good reason I know nothing about Anders Breivik, the man who blew up a government building and shot 76 teenage Marxists in Norway. As part of its agenda to invent home-grown “right wing terrorism,” the CTC are trying to fit me up as being an associate of Breivik, whom I’ve never met.

READ MORE...

Do we hear governments, the mass media, and academia calling for Japan to bring in millions of non-Japanese people and assimilate with them because they’re “not diverse enough”?
Why are they doing this in ALL and ONLY White countries?
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
____________________________________________________________
No one says a neighborhood that is 100% black needs more diversity.
No one says a neighborhood that is 100% asian needs more diversity.
No one says a neighborhood that is 100% oriental needs more diversity.
They are already 100% diverse.
All white neighborhoods and only white neighborhoods always need to be more diverse. White neighborhoods only stop needing to be more diverse when there are no white people left in them.
Diversity is a codeword for white genocide.
__________________________________________________________________
Anti-whites say there is this RACE problem. Anti-whites say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
Anti-whites say the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
This is a policy of White genocide.
“Anti-racist” is code-word for anti-white.
Diversity and Multiculturalism are codewords for WHITE GENOCIDE

_____________________________________________________________________
We have massive immigration into all white countries, and it is only being forced on white countries. We have forced integration of all these non-whites. Anti-whites call themselves anti-racists and promote intermarriage and condemn people who oppose intermarriage. And then they talk about a brown future in formerly white countries.
YOU ANTI-WHITES are part of this program of genocide against my race, the white race.
We must never protect White people in their view. They are anti-white.

___________________________________________________________________
Asia for the Asians. Africa for the Africans. White countries for everybody. It isn’t an African problem. Nobody is flooding Africa with non-Africans and giving them affirmative action, special rights and privileges and free health care. Only white countries are doing this. Only white leaders are supporting this. Only white children are suffering from it. It is genocide.
ANTI-RACIST IS JUST ANOTHER CODEWORD FOR THE ANTI-WHITE
DIVERSITY == SYSTEM OF WHITE GENOCIDE-BY-ASSIMILATION!!!

___________________________________________________________________
Funny how the “Melting Pot” agenda is being pushed in EVERY white nation on the face of planet earth.

No one says “Japan” needs to become a “Melting Pot”.

No one says China, Africa, Mexico, Haiti, or Israel should be deluged with massive random, foreign populations to demonstrate how “moral” they are, or to “enrich” their sorely lacking culture.
It’s a program to eliminate white people from existence, plain and simple.
It’s a form of Genocide under International Law.

_____________________________________________________

Anti-Whites say there should be no White Countries ✓
Anti-Whites say there should be no White Towns ✓
Anti-Whites say there should be no White Neighbourhoods ✓
Anti-Whites say there should be no White Schools✓
Anti-Whites say there should be no White Classes ✓
Anti-Whites say there should be no White Sports ✓
Anti-Whites say there should be no White Anything ✓
Anti-Whites say there should be no Whites
Anti racism is a code word for anti White.

I had a brief online exchange today with Paul Weston, leader of British Freedom, the post-LJB party of cultural nationalism.  Paul frequently comments at the DT, cutting a capable and clued-up figure.  Today, he arrived on the thread to an Ed West piece on the maverick George Galloway’s rather remarkable by-election victory in the hitherto safe Labour seat of Bradford West.

There have been opinion pieces galore on Galloway’s triumph.  Most, like West’s, have talked about the implications it may hold for a new politics of identity.  Galloway, of course, appeals to the Moslem electorate.  An ethnic sundering of voting habits may be in train, and that would spell destruction for the big three parties and a huge opportunity for the minnows.  Paul Weston, as the new leader of a very new minnow, certainly understands that, and took the opportunity to expand upon it on the thread.  My replies follow suite.  I may have been a little hard on him.  But I just don’t believe in this necessity to disavow our true purpose.

READ MORE...